Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below. Your integration has the following runs in the integration events report (Date format of MM/DD/YYYY):
Run #1
* Core Connector: Worker Integration System was launched on May 15, 2024 at 3:00:00 AM
* As of Entry Moment: 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/15/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/01/2024
Run #2
* Core Connector: Worker Integration System was launched on May 31, 2024 at 3:00:00 AM
* As of Entry Moment: 05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/31/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/15/2024
On May 13, 2024 Brian Hill receives a salary increase. The new salary amount is set to $90,000.00 with an effective date of May 22, 2024. Which of these runs will include Brian Hill ' s compensation change?

• A. Brian Hill will be included in both integration runs.
• B. Brian Hill will only be included the second integration run.
• C. Brian Hill will be excluded from both integration runs.
• D. Brian Hill will only be included in the first integration run.

What is the limitation when assigning ISUs to integration systems?

• A. An ISU can be assigned to an unlimited number of integration systems.
• B. An ISU can be assigned to only one integration system.
• C. An ISU can be assigned to five integration systems.
• D. An ISU can only be assigned to an ISSG and not an integration system.

Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below.
You are configuring a Core Connector: Worker integration to send data to a new external compliance and certification tracking vendor. You have begun to configure the connector with the Data Initialization Service (DIS) enabled. Your goal is to extract worker qualification data, but the vendor has three specific requirements:
The file must only include Active workers who are in the "Clinical Staff" Job Family.
The vendor has specified that for each worker's Education data, they only want to receive the Institution Name, Institution Type and Degree.
The vendor requires a custom "License ID" that must combine the Certification Name and Issuing State, for example, "RN-CA". A Calculated Field that provides this custom "License ID" already exists in the tenant.
During testing, using a Full File run, the output file is missing all education-related information, even though you believe you have initially configured field attributes such as Institution Name, Institution Type and Degree in the Configure Integration Field Attributes step. Additionally, you confirmed that the Worker Qualification Data Section is marked as Include in Output.
What should you do to resolve this issue?

• A. Enable the Worker Qualification Data Section Fields Service within the Configure Integration Services step.
• B. Mark each education field in the Education subfolder as Required in Configure Integration Field Attributes.
• C. Within the Configure Integration Services task, select the Enable All Services checkbox.
• D. Enable the Education subfolder in Configure Integration Field Attributes and then reselect the Institution Name, Institution Type, and Degree fields.

Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below.
You have been asked to build an integration using the Core Connector: Worker template and should leverage the Data Initialization Service (DIS). The integration will be used to export a full file (no change detection) for employees only and will include personal data.
What configuration is required to ensure that only employees, and not contingent workers, are output by this integration?

• A. Configure a map for worker type in the Integration Maps.
• B. Configure eligibility in the Integration Field Overrides.
• C. Configure the Integration Population Eligibility.
• D. Configure worker type in the Integration Field Attributes.